2014’s heartwarming Christmas pharma campaigns.

While the world squabbles over the relative merits or otherwise of the John lewis Monty the penguin ad (16 million views) and a certain WW1 footballing (10 million views) spot I thought I’d divert your gaze to Pharmaland’s big Christmas campaigns for a quick overview.

And I must say this year’s crop are laying on the schmaltz like only the great pharma ads can.

First up is the new Viagra spot, which launched in the middle of I’m a celebrity.

For those of you who missed it, it features a rosy-cheeked man in his sixties with a hipsterish long white beard and a big wobbly belly, which could be full of jelly, but it’s hard to tell.

MXEV103-14_2013_114958_low_p1447588

The Rosy-cheeked hipster in the Viagra ad

He and his saucy 25 year old wife are hanging up their stockings on Christmas eve but simply can’t find anywhere to hang them. Nothing seems to catch and there are no hooks in their wooden cabin….but wait a minute…a small blue pill and a glass of water later and the young wife’s eyes widen as she looks downward…and yes folks, problem solved and the stocking is hung.

And hung well.

The endline…’We’re up for Christmas, are you?’ was a nice heartwarming touch.

The equally heartwarming Lipitor ad first hit our screens during Xfactor and aims to remind us all that Christmas lunch and all the hullabaloo of the party season is no reason to lose control of your health.

It features a doctor the size of a ‘good angel’ who lands on a patient’s shoulder during the party season. She wags her fingers as she whispers in to his ear.

The final scene is our patient hero as he is served a nice green salad at a big family Christmas lunch and while everyone else is happily tucking in to turkey he munches cheerily on a lettuce leaf and sips a glass of sparkling water.

The song is a reworded version of ‘white Christmas’ with the words ‘I’m dreaming of a slight Christmas’ replacing the original.

The endline ‘It’s what Christmas is Cholesterolabout’ is cheesy (low fat) but heartwarming.

The Warfarin campaign started life on youtube and has become a social media sensation even before it dominated our screens with Colin the Christmas clot. As you no doubt will have seen on your Facebook or twitter feed, it features the heartwarming animated story of a small blood cell who is looking for love but simply can’t find a partner to ‘get together with’.

Colin the clot

Colin the blood cell’s animated love story

Even at Christmas he has no luck at the office party, until his eyes meet a lady blood cell’s eyes across a crowded dance floor.

They smooch to Frankie goes to Hollywood’s ‘power of love’ and are about to kiss when a security guard with the word ‘Warfarin’ on his lapel steps in and separates them. He angrily points to a sign that reads ‘STRICTLY NO CLOTTING’ and Colin is booted out of the party and we see him walk dejectedly to the bus stop.

The voice over tells us, ‘Because bleedin’ Christmas is about not getting together’ in what I presume is Ray Winstone doing his usual cockney performance.

I know I had a lump in my throat when I first saw it.

Lastly the campaign for Aracipt featuring an old lady who is left all alone in a nursing home on Christmas day until her entire family show up to give her presents. I loved her line “who are you all again?”

At this time of year when people are over indulging and generally disregarding their health with gay abandon it’s nice to see that the pharma advertising industry is making the most of it and really ramping-up the communications beyond just flu vaccinations.

I mean, imagine if we just totally ignored it and didn’t maximise it at all?

 

 

Offending doesn’t mean it won’t work.

This has stood out from my first day in pharmaland as a big difference between health and consumer.

The worry that the marketing of a new drug might imply the HCP has been doing it wrong up to now and the (ad) concept might offend their sense of professional pride.

And why do we worry about that? because the HCPs are keen to assure us that this is how they will feel if we dare be impudent.

And so we dutifully avoid any notion of professional ineptitude, (even though they were doing their best with the available tools) no matter how motivating our message might actually be.

But since when were doctors or nurses experts in communication?

We already know that just because car drivers say ‘spare us all that creative stuff just show us the car and the price’ we should probably avoid their marketing advice and be as creative as we can – because it works.

Why else would you buy a Peugeot?

But with Doctors? No, we tip-toe around their sensibilities because that’s their professional advice.

Professional marketing advice, mind you.

Where do we draw the line between research findings and a respondent’s marketing expertise?

So what they are saying is this:

“Dear Mr Hamilton we have a new car for you this Formula 1 season, it’s faster, better acceleration and can take a corner like nothing before”

“You saying I’m a crap driver?”

The entire reason for being, as the French say, of advertising is to get the consumer to buy the product. Full stop.

Imagine a headline that read: “I never use drug X” Trainee oncologist aged 42

Offensive in every way, and yet…hmmm…not a bad idea when you think about it.

So do you worry about offending 42 year old trainee oncologists or making actual oncologists feel smug and self satisfied at using the product?

In consumerland it really doesn’t occur to to anyone that people might be offended, professionally or personally at the idea of them currently using substandard products.

Even in business to business ‘We can get building products to you faster than before’ is not a slight on a foreman’s ability to get drainage supplies on time.

People don’t get offended personally because they tend to think the idiots or underachievers the ads are referring to are in the next office, not theirs. They may feel inadequate momentarily but that is rectified swiftly by that new product.

Job done.

So who are these delicate flowers whose sensibilities are so fragile that we dare not imply our product might supercede their current one?

What happens to these disaffected professionals that could be so damaging to your brand?

Do they sulk and keep their customers knowingly ill, out of ill feeling?

Do they organise a boycott of this upstart product which has implied their qualities as a professional are questionable?

Do they ignore all evidence of efficacy out of bloody mindedness?

Will they banish any Rep from the premises?

Probably not.

I think a more likely reaction would be to give this new product a try.

So is it always wrong to be offensive?

The ad for Pancreatic cancer that featured the headline¬† ‘I wish I had breast cancer’ outraged everyone, seemingly.

crop-2552308-1B380E1700000578-208_1024x615_large

People were fanning themselves like someone had just said ‘arse’ at an Edwardian summer tea party for ladies of delicate disposition.

To a small amount of people it may even have been offensive.

(Certainly the nation’s art directors and typographers were appalled, but that’s a different issue).

But thanks now to earlier diagnosis, as a result of the awareness created, the NHS could save £3.1 million.

That’s a ROI of 4000:1

Maybe that kind of offensiveness isn’t so bad.

And maybe HCPs aren’t as delicate as we fear, despite what they tell us in research, because people generally aren’t delicate.

Disinterested, busy, distracted, yes. Delicate, not so much.

So, the question is what happens if we do imply the doc’s current treatment knowledge is a bit lagging behind the rest of the industry?

Sometimes putting everything in a positive light just makes everything appear lit the same way. I’m sure that we will continue to take our customers marketing advice and be wary of their wrath.

And that’s probably why the beaches and the parks of pharma-adland will remain overcrowded with happy looking couples all looking the same, saying the same things and living the same mindless, fulfilling lives.

And I’m sorry but..that is offensive.

 

 

(agree? disagree? leave a comment – and while we’re about it you can follow me @ollyc47 on twitter if you’ve a mind to)