So it’s been Pharma-awards season recently and we have a few on the horizon.
Did your agency enter work this year but not garner the adulation you expected?
We’ve all been there.
If so, there’s a reason for it and it isn’t necessarily because your work wasn’t good enough.
It’s because jurors are well….a bit thick.
I should know, I have often been one and I am thicker than Simon Cowell’s platform heels.
You may reasonably deduce that your work wasn’t good enough, but really…because of the general fuckwittery of us jurors it was probably more accurately – your entry wasn’t good enough.
Yes, in the midst of that excited preparation of entries for creative awards it’s easy to forget who your target market is.
Frustratingly, juries are made up in the most part, not from sciencey people, clients or account people who know the brief, the brand and the disease area but the kind of cool kids who would copy your homework at school and still somehow get less marks than you.
Otherwise known as other creatives.
I know. It seems unfair.
And what compounds the problem is that it’s usually us banana-brained flowery-shirted neanderthals who prepare the entries. It would be a vicious circle if the people involved on both sides were smart enough to be vicious.
You see, your entry may have made a few basic, not unreasonable assumptions.
These are that:
- Jurors would bother to find out what disease the brand was indicated for, if it wasn’t obvious.
- Jurors would bother to read the 5pt font that explained what the idea was because the concept page was printed on A4 but designed in A3.
- Jurors would instinctively know what the work was trying to achieve.
- A video of the app in use with no commentary and crudely shot on an iPhone would hold their attention beyond the first five seconds.
- A case history video rushed together on the morning of the deadline with no voice over and subtitles so quick that they could induce epilepsy was sufficient to fully capture the glory of the whole project.
- That in a case history video Jurors will be captivated by the five minute testimony of the client’s conference delegates, telling them how much ‘they loved the stand’ because your agency didn’t re-edit it for awards and just used the one you used for creds meetings.
If you made any of these assumptions without making allowances for we sludge-brained amoeba that sit on juries you might be hiding your light under the tinsiest of bushels.
From what I’ve seen, the work that does well in any awards show (certainly for any craft category) isn’t just a good idea…it’s well presented with the concept up front and personal, with some legible copy explaining the brief and why the solution is what it is.
Make it easy for a horses-arse like me, and just like your lovely work that needs to be recognised as such, keep it simple.
Then cross your fingers.
Leave a Reply